|
FONTANA TO INTRODUCE TOOL TO ADDRESS TAX
EXEMPT PROPERTIES
|

Fontana |
HARRISBURG, March 14 ‑
State Senator Wayne D. Fontana (D-Allegheny)
today announced that he will introduce
legislation that allow municipalities
additional tools to address costs associated
with providing essential services where the
municipality contains a large percentage of
tax exempt property.
Fontana said that the bill,
currently being circulated for co-sponsors,
is intended as a starting point for
discussions on how to address this growing
issue, “No one is disputing the impact that
non-profits have on our communities – the
jobs provided, their economic impact, or the
importance of their community involvement
and service, but there is a cost to the
services that are provided to them.
Municipalities aren’t able to generate tax
revenue from those properties owned by
non-profits, but must still provide services
– that cost is shared by the residents and
companies who are paying property taxes in
that municipality.”
The bill would allow municipalities the
option to enact an essential service fee of
up to $100 per 1,000 square feet, with the
first 5,000 square feet exempt, on
non-profits with tax-exempt property. For
new properties, the municipality could
impose a limited property tax that would be
phased in and applied to 10% of its assessed
value per year for five years.
The essential service fee and limited
property tax would not be mandated for
municipalities. In fact, nothing would
prohibit municipalities from continuing to
operate under the Purely Public Charities
Act as it exists today, with the option to
enter into voluntary agreements with
non-profits. That option, however, has been
increasingly difficult for municipalities
that have an extraordinarily high
concentration of tax-exempt property owned
by non-profits. In the City of Pittsburgh,
one-third of the property is tax-exempt. A
2003 study estimated that that the total
value of that property was $2.9 billion and
would generate $31.3 million in property
taxes.
The City of Pittsburgh has benefited from a
voluntary service agreement with the
Pittsburgh Public Service Fund in the past,
which has contributed $13.98 million in the
last three years (an average of $4.66
million per year) to the City from more than
100 tax-exempt universities, hospitals,
health insurers, foundations, arts groups
and religious organizations. The Fund is
expected to begin talks with the City on a
new three-year agreement, but the agreements
are voluntary and the participating
organizations do not need to contribute
anything if they do not wish to do so. Even
more daunting is that Individual entities’
payments are confidential and a well-known
non-profit resident of the City – the
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
– will not be participating in future
agreements with the City, but is instead
focusing on its pledge to the Pittsburgh
Promise.
The proposed legislation will probably be
part of a larger discussion being held later
today with members of Allegheny County
Council who are seeking alternatives to the
County’s drink tax. The meeting with state
lawmakers was called by Allegheny County
Council; someone from the Chief Executive’s
Office is also expected to attend. |