|
KEEPING A SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF IN
SCRANTON
I have never wavered from my effort to
find a lasting and permanent way for
deaf and hard-of hearing students to
continue receiving a quality education
right here in Scranton.
That has been my priority. And that
remains my priority.
Several local legislators and I have
left no stone unturned in evaluating
alternatives and exploring all options
to meet the needs of students. After
all, the students are the ones who would
suffer the most from the school’s
scheduled closure on July 1. Without
the kind of long-term solution we are
currently working on to keep the
facility operating, the school would
indeed be closed and students dispersed
to various intermediate units or
dispatched to other areas of the state.
In order to save the school, various
parties have come together to carefully
lay out a workable-plan offering a
smooth transition while striving for
educational excellence at the school.
Unfortunately, some media reports on the
progress of the proposal to keep the
school open have been inaccurate, based
only on fragments of information and
reliant on incomplete plans from
uninformed sources. Clearly some, who
should know better, are trying to score
public relations points rather than
confront this very critical and complex
challenge in a meaningful way.
While I understand that students,
parents and faculty members are eager
for a solution so they can make
definitive plans for next year, it would
have been unwise to hastily implement a
plan or irresponsibly report on delicate
and unfinished negotiations.
That’s why I have worked closely with
Gov. Ed Rendell, the Pennsylvania
Department of Education, fellow
lawmakers and school officials over the
last few months to shift the school away
from being state-run to privately owned
and operated. All of this would be
accomplished while maintaining the
mission to “enable and empower each
enrolled student to reach his or her
full potential.”
To reach that goal, we’ve worked on
identifying alternatives to ensure that
a quality education program for deaf and
hard-of-hearing students is maintained
in northeastern Pennsylvania on a
permanent basis. I’ve talked to experts
and administrators in the field, visited
other facilities and discussed issues
that range from the quality of education
to the financial means to assure
continuity.
It is important to note that keeping
this state-run school open indefinitely
was not a viable option, and would have
been nearly impossible to fund in this
budget year where state lawmakers are
struggling to find ways to make up an
estimated $3 billion budget deficit.
Even with some temporary reprieve, there
would certainly be no guarantee that the
school would survive the next time the
Department of Education was tasked with
making budget cuts. I am not willing to
risk the future of these children and
this century-old facility on band-aid
reprieves. Too much is at stake.
We’ve tried to work on a reasonable and
rational transition plan that may, at
the end of the day, offer tremendous
opportunities and new resources for
students to learn and grow. Yet, we
have more work to do and precious little
time to make decisions.
This three-year phased transition plan
that is now being discussed will
permanently save a school for deaf and
hard-of-hearing students in northeastern
Pennsylvania, keep the school in
Scranton and tap other resources while
providing even better opportunities for
deaf and hard-of-hearing students to
reach their full potential.
Finally, I want to reiterate to the
parents of the Scranton State School for
the Deaf that their children’s education
has always been my priority and will
continue to be as we work toward a
long-term, long-lasting solution.
Sen. Robert J. Mellow (D) is the Senate
Democratic Leader. He represents
Lackawanna County and portions of
Luzerne and Monroe counties. |